Comparison of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms for high-resolution adaptive optics systems | |
Cheng, Shengyi1,2,3; Dong, Lizhi1,2; Chen, Shanqiu1,2; Yang, Ping1,2; Ao, Mingwu4; Xu, Bing1,2 | |
Volume | 9298 |
Pages | 92981M |
2014 | |
Language | 英语 |
ISSN | 0277786X |
DOI | 10.1117/12.2072685 |
Indexed By | Ei |
Subtype | 会议论文 |
Abstract | Based on a 979-actuator adaptive optics system, this paper analyzes the different performance of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms. Under the condition of dynamic wavefront errors, the iteration number, storage space and the number of multiplication of steepest descent method, conjugate gradient method and G-S iterative method are studied. The steepest descent method and conjugate gradient method need smaller storage space. Both the G-S iterative method and the conjugate gradient method converge faster than steepest descent method, while the latter takes the least number of multiplication. Finally, the optimal iterative algorithm is selected considering storage space, iteration numbers and the number of multiplication. © 2014 SPIE.; Based on a 979-actuator adaptive optics system, this paper analyzes the different performance of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms. Under the condition of dynamic wavefront errors, the iteration number, storage space and the number of multiplication of steepest descent method, conjugate gradient method and G-S iterative method are studied. The steepest descent method and conjugate gradient method need smaller storage space. Both the G-S iterative method and the conjugate gradient method converge faster than steepest descent method, while the latter takes the least number of multiplication. Finally, the optimal iterative algorithm is selected considering storage space, iteration numbers and the number of multiplication. © 2014 SPIE. |
Conference Name | Proceedings of SPIE: International Symposium on Optoelectronic Technology and Application 2014: Imaging Spectroscopy; and Telescopes and Large Optics |
Conference Date | 2014 |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | 会议论文 |
Identifier | http://ir.ioe.ac.cn/handle/181551/7821 |
Collection | 自适应光学技术研究室(八室) |
Corresponding Author | Xu, Bing |
Affiliation | 1. Laboratory on Adaptive Optics, Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China 2. Key Laboratory on Adaptive Optics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 4. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Cheng, Shengyi,Dong, Lizhi,Chen, Shanqiu,et al. Comparison of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms for high-resolution adaptive optics systems[C],2014:92981M. |
Files in This Item: | ||||||
File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
2014-2162.pdf(302KB) | 会议论文 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | Application Full Text |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment