中国科学院光电技术研究所机构知识库
Advanced  
IOE OpenIR  > 自适应光学技术研究室(八室)  > 会议论文
题名:
Comparison of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms for high-resolution adaptive optics systems
作者: Cheng, Shengyi1,2,3; Dong, Lizhi1,2; Chen, Shanqiu1,2; Yang, Ping1,2; Ao, Mingwu4; Xu, Bing1,2
出版日期: 2014
会议名称: Proceedings of SPIE: International Symposium on Optoelectronic Technology and Application 2014: Imaging Spectroscopy; and Telescopes and Large Optics
会议日期: 2014
学科分类: Adaptive optics - Algorithms - Conjugate gradient method - Steepest descent method - Telescopes - Wavefronts
DOI: 10.1117/12.2072685
通讯作者: Xu, Bing
中文摘要: Based on a 979-actuator adaptive optics system, this paper analyzes the different performance of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms. Under the condition of dynamic wavefront errors, the iteration number, storage space and the number of multiplication of steepest descent method, conjugate gradient method and G-S iterative method are studied. The steepest descent method and conjugate gradient method need smaller storage space. Both the G-S iterative method and the conjugate gradient method converge faster than steepest descent method, while the latter takes the least number of multiplication. Finally, the optimal iterative algorithm is selected considering storage space, iteration numbers and the number of multiplication. © 2014 SPIE.
英文摘要: Based on a 979-actuator adaptive optics system, this paper analyzes the different performance of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms. Under the condition of dynamic wavefront errors, the iteration number, storage space and the number of multiplication of steepest descent method, conjugate gradient method and G-S iterative method are studied. The steepest descent method and conjugate gradient method need smaller storage space. Both the G-S iterative method and the conjugate gradient method converge faster than steepest descent method, while the latter takes the least number of multiplication. Finally, the optimal iterative algorithm is selected considering storage space, iteration numbers and the number of multiplication. © 2014 SPIE.
收录类别: Ei
语种: 英语
卷号: 9298
ISSN号: 0277786X
文章类型: 会议论文
页码: 92981M
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 会议论文
URI标识: http://ir.ioe.ac.cn/handle/181551/7821
Appears in Collections:自适应光学技术研究室(八室)_会议论文

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
2014-2162.pdf(302KB)会议论文--限制开放View 联系获取全文

作者单位: 1. Laboratory on Adaptive Optics, Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China
2. Key Laboratory on Adaptive Optics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
4. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Recommended Citation:
Cheng, Shengyi,Dong, Lizhi,Chen, Shanqiu,et al. Comparison of iterative wavefront reconstruction algorithms for high-resolution adaptive optics systems[C]. 见:Proceedings of SPIE: International Symposium on Optoelectronic Technology and Application 2014: Imaging Spectroscopy; and Telescopes and Large Optics. 2014.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Shengyi]'s Articles
[Dong, Lizhi]'s Articles
[Chen, Shanqiu]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Cheng, Shengyi]‘s Articles
[Dong, Lizhi]‘s Articles
[Chen, Shanqiu]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit
文件名: 2014-2162.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 
评注功能仅针对注册用户开放,请您登录
您对该条目有什么异议,请填写以下表单,管理员会尽快联系您。
内 容:
Email:  *
单位:
验证码:   刷新
您在IR的使用过程中有什么好的想法或者建议可以反馈给我们。
标 题:
 *
内 容:
Email:  *
验证码:   刷新

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2016  中国科学院光电技术研究所 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace